Brain networks under attack : robustness properties and the impact of lesions

A growing number of studies approach the brain as a complex network, the so-called ‘connectome’. Adopting this framework, we examine what types or extent of damage the brain can withstand—referred to as network ‘robustness’—and conversely, which kind of distortions can be expected after brain lesions. To this end, we review computational lesion studies and empirical studies investigating network alterations in brain tumour, stroke and traumatic brain injury patients. Common to these three types of focal injury is that there is no unequivocal relationship between the anatomical lesion site and its topological characteristics within the brain network. Furthermore, large-scale network effects of these focal lesions are compared to those of a widely studied multifocal neurodegenerative disorder, Alzheimer’s disease, in which central parts of the connectome are preferentially affected. Results indicate that human brain networks are remarkably resilient to different types of lesions, compared to other types of complex networks such as random or scale-free networks. However, lesion effects have been found to depend critically on the topological position of the lesion. In particular, damage to network hub regions—and especially those connecting different subnetworks—was found to cause the largest disturbances in network organization. Regardless of lesion location, evidence from empirical and computational lesion studies shows that lesions cause significant alterations in global network topology. The direction of these changes though remains to be elucidated. Encouragingly, both empirical and modelling studies have indicated that after focal damage, the connectome carries the potential to recover at least to some extent, with normalization of graph metrics being related to improved behavioural and cognitive functioning. To conclude, we highlight possible clinical implications of these findings, point out several methodological limitations that pertain to the study of brain diseases adopting a network approach, and provide suggestions for future research

Modeling brain dynamics in brain tumor patients using the virtual brain

Presurgical planning for brain tumor resection aims at delineating eloquent tissue in the vicinity of the lesion to spare during surgery. To this end, noninvasive neuroimaging techniques such as functional MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging fiber tracking are currently employed. However, taking into account this information is often still insufficient, as the complex nonlinear dynamics of the brain impede straightforward prediction of functional outcome after surgical intervention. Large-scale brain network modeling carries the potential to bridge this gap by integrating neuroimaging data with biophysically based models to predict collective brain dynamics. As a first step in this direction, an appropriate computational model has to be selected, after which suitable model parameter values have to be determined. To this end, we simulated large-scale brain dynamics in 25 human brain tumor patients and 11 human control participants using The Virtual Brain, an open-source neuroinformatics platform. Local and global model parameters of the Reduced Wong-Wang model were individually optimized and compared between brain tumor patients and control subjects. In addition, the relationship between model parameters and structural network topology and cognitive performance was assessed. Results showed (1) significantly improved prediction accuracy of individual functional connectivity when using individually optimized model parameters; (2) local model parameters that can differentiate between regions directly affected by a tumor, regions distant from a tumor, and regions in a healthy brain; and (3) interesting associations between individually optimized model parameters and structural network topology and cognitive performance

Modeling brain dynamics after tumor resection using The Virtual Brain

Brain tumor patients scheduled for tumor resection often face significant uncertainty, as the outcome of neurosurgery is difficult to predict at the individual patient level. Recently, simulation of the activity of neural populations connected according to the white matter fibers, producing personalized brain network models, has been introduced as a promising tool for this purpose. The Virtual Brain provides a robust open source framework to implement these models. However, brain network models first have to be validated, before they can be used to predict brain dynamics. In prior work, we optimized individual brain network model parameters to maximize the fit with empirical brain activity. In this study, we extend this line of research by examining the stability of fitted parameters before and after tumor resection, and compare it with baseline parameter variability using data from healthy control subjects. Based on these findings, we perform the first "virtual neurosurgery", mimicking patient's actual surgery by removing white matter fibers in the resection mask and simulating again neural activity on this new connectome. We find that brain network model parameters are relatively stable over time in brain tumor patients who underwent tumor resection, compared with baseline variability in healthy control subjects. Concerning the virtual neurosurgery analyses, use of the pre-surgery model implemented on the virtually resected structural connectome resulted in improved similarity with post-surgical empirical functional connectivity in some patients, but negligible improvement in others. These findings reveal interesting avenues for increasing interactions between computational neuroscience and neuro-oncology, as well as important limitations that warrant further investigation

26th Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting (CNS*2017): Part 3 - Meeting Abstracts - Antwerp, Belgium. 15–20 July 2017

This work was produced as part of the activities of FAPESP Research,\ud Disseminations and Innovation Center for Neuromathematics (grant\ud 2013/07699-0, S. Paulo Research Foundation). NLK is supported by a\ud FAPESP postdoctoral fellowship (grant 2016/03855-5). ACR is partially\ud supported by a CNPq fellowship (grant 306251/2014-0)

BTC_preop

Brain Tumor Connectomics Data Post-operative data of 7 glioma patients, 12 meningioma patients (1 [sub-PAT11] with bad data quality) and 10 control subjects. Out of the 11 glioma patients, 14 meningioma patients, and 11 healthy controls that were included pre-surgically ("BTC_preop, ds001226" on OpenNeuro), 7 glioma patients (1 drop-out, 1 no resection, 2 end of study), 12 meningioma patients (1 drop-out, 1 MRI not possible because of cochlear implant), and 10 healthy controls (1 drop-out) agreed to participate post-operatively

BTC_postop

Brain Tumor Connectomics Data Post-operative data of 7 glioma patients, 12 meningioma patients (1 [sub-PAT11] with bad data quality) and 10 control subjects. Out of the 11 glioma patients, 14 meningioma patients, and 11 healthy controls that were included pre-surgically ("BTC_preop, ds001226" on OpenNeuro), 7 glioma patients (1 drop-out, 1 no resection, 2 end of study), 12 meningioma patients (1 drop-out, 1 MRI not possible because of cochlear implant), and 10 healthy controls (1 drop-out) agreed to participate post-operatively